It’s not that difficult. Put a glossary together specific to this ontology (information science sense). Then draw lines between the “truly” connections.

It’s not that difficult. Put a glossary together specific to this ontology (information science sense). Then draw lines between the “truly” connections.

==

It won’t convey how it makes you feel inside but systems logic is mappable.
 —
You’re a pragmatist is theoretical. Global prescriptive (we should as humans) vs “let’s play a game” and “you should”.
You both are speaking English but from different starting points and you have conversation banter in common.
Is diplomacy possible? Is there such a thing as a meeting point in the middle? I think so. I don’t know what that is but it depends upon the interest and patience of the participants.
==
and I’m here pretending to have a clue but I’m just doing an ad-hoc analysis
  • Like

====

 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


nine − 9 =

Leave a Reply