It’s justifiable outrage theatre but yes, it is outrage theater. All we can do is sit and watch and be outraged. People will use this case to leverage their political careers as they are sure to dig in deeper and bring out as much outrage voting as they can, either for themselves, or against their opponents. A search for it and I see only ONE SINGULAR OPINION on the internet about it. The same as yours. I also see what? Influencers using this case to keep their viewers outraged. They might not even care about the case that much themselves, but so long as it gets clicks and views, they’ll milk it for themselves. Where’s the opposing opinion? Where’s the inbetween position? I don’t see it. The prosecutors talk about this as a standard “getting guns off the streets” case. And yes, it has merit and it’s justifiable outrage.

It’s justifiable outrage theatre but yes, it is outrage theater. All we can do is sit and watch and be outraged. People will use this case to leverage their political careers as they are sure to dig in deeper and bring out as much outrage voting as they can, either for themselves, or against their opponents.
A search for it and I see only ONE SINGULAR OPINION on the internet about it. The same as yours.
I also see what? Influencers using this case to keep their viewers outraged. They might not even care about the case that much themselves, but so long as it gets clicks and views, they’ll milk it for themselves.
Where’s the opposing opinion? Where’s the inbetween position?
I don’t see it. The prosecutors talk about this as a standard “getting guns off the streets” case.
And yes, it has merit and it’s justifiable outrage.

[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]