It was real to you when you first printed it. You never had doubt. That’s fine but it’s just confirming what you already believe. anonymous sources _must_ be taken with a grain of skepticism. It doesn’t mean they’re wrong but because they’re anonymous you have to hold back full agreement at least a little because there’s NOBODY to verify it. It’s a step above “I heard a guy say that” but only just. https://www.spj.org/ethics-papers-anonymity.asp

It was real to you when you first printed it. You never had doubt. That’s fine but it’s just confirming what you already believe.
anonymous sources _must_ be taken with a grain of skepticism. It doesn’t mean they’re wrong but because they’re anonymous you have to hold back full agreement at least a little because there’s NOBODY to verify it. It’s a step above “I heard a guy say that” but only just.
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


2 × six =

Leave a Reply