it can’t FULLY comprehend, because our brains are just too small and must compress into patterns.

I know. But even then, they’re simplifications of reality for human usage from a human perspective.

That’s not to say they’re not partially describing “almosts” that are useful because they ARE useful.

There are patterns that the Universe seems to follow. But the math only offers a workable skeleton of reality without the full complexity and uniqueness of it. It will always be “almost but not quite”. The map is not the territory. It will always remain a map for humans to use for the territory with which it can’t FULLY comprehend, because our brains are just too small and must compress into patterns.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


9 − four =

Leave a Reply