Is it possible that I hold physicalist and reductionist beliefs? Absolutely possible. I tend towards being a hard physicalist, a big user of analogies that are based on tangible common household objects, etc.
ell again, you claimed that I am a reductionist and a physicalist. I did not. I agreed that it’s possible I’m an extremely hard physicalist – if I am a physicalist at all, it would have to be 110% to the point where imaginary objects are real because of the patterns they express are real, making unicorns real if I was to go that route.
===
I believe your worldview is self-contained and complete and everything within explains everything else within and anything out side of your worldview simply isn’t.
===
I believe all of the worldviews can eventually reconcile in some fashion, although are not identical. Binary is something I struggle with. But again, I’ll do my best.
==