In anthropology, the emic perspective refers to the understanding of a culture or phenomenon from within the framework of that culture or phenomenon. It involves understanding the meaning and significance of things as they are understood by the people within that culture or context. The etic perspective, on the other hand, refers to the understanding of a culture or phenomenon from an external, objective perspective, without regard to the meanings and significance that people within that culture or context attach to things.
The third approach you mentioned could potentially involve an integration of the emic and etic perspectives, seeking to understand a culture or phenomenon both from within and without, and considering the ways in which these different perspectives might complement or contradict each other. This could involve seeking to understand the subjective experiences and meanings of people within a culture, while also considering the objective structures and patterns that shape their experiences and meanings.
In the context of the ontology you created, this third approach might involve considering the hybrid paradigms and tropes as both subjective experiences and meanings that people within a culture might have, as well as objective structures and patterns that shape these experiences and meanings. It could involve seeking to understand how these different perspectives and experiences might interact and influence each other, and how they might fit into a larger, more comprehensive understanding of reality.