I’m talking to you, not to an army you represent Ok. I diagrammed in basic form what I heard. Communication 101 from college goes over the fact that we all have filters concepts go through as we communicate — there is no direct lines in communication. So you have your filters, I have my filters, and in communication we’re in the process of negotiating meaning. So, is this very basic form accurately represent the stance you have or should I shift the dotted line down?

 I’m talking to you, not to an army you represent 
Ok. I diagrammed in basic form what I heard. Communication 101 from college goes over the fact that we all have filters concepts go through as we communicate — there is no direct lines in communication. So you have your filters, I have my filters, and in communication we’re in the process of negotiating meaning.
So, is this very basic form accurately represent the stance you have or should I shift the dotted line down?
I enjoyed the definitions you gave that you are working with but if you’re doing a Cartman stance, it’ll be difficult to negotiate meaning so that we can end up in an agreement position.
I don’t take a computational model position for brain function although I use it as a metaphor so that may be an area of divergence.
===

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× nine = 81

Leave a Reply