I’m enjoying running various AI tests. Same inputs run through different topic classifiers leads to much different results because each has its own focus.

I’m enjoying running various AI tests. Same inputs run through different topic classifiers leads to much different results because each has its own focus.
 
MATH: AI: Politics 33%, Future 30%, Philosophy 28%, Sexuality 4%
 
SOCIAL SCIENCES: ATHEISM : RAISING TEENAGERS: Politics 55%, Transgendered 44%
 
PHYSICS: Future 66%, Philosophy 26%, Paranormal 7%
 
Agriculture: COOKING: Lifestyle_Choices 100%
 
Technology : video gaming music party video games : Folklore 32%, Relationships 23%, Holidays 16%, Paranormal 11%, Subcultures 9%, Crime 4%, Transgendered 2%, Law 1%, Ethnicity 1%, Politics
Here, I was able to create some logical groups.
 
a) SCIENCE TOPICS which I was able to group.
4 Math, 11 Social Sciences, 1 Physics, 3 Agriculture, 1 Technology.
 
b) IAB2 (International Advertising Bureau, 2nd Edition). These classifications are commonly used to determine what ads you see. Having free access to that via uClassify is a dream come true for me as I always wanted some control over finding this stuff out.
 
c) SOCIETY TOPICS . These came from the DMOZ Society categories and training. I don’t know what it means but it’s interesting just seeing it.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


5 × = thirty five

Leave a Reply