If a State or whatever law-making/law-enforcement body insisted upon every individual pregnancy be attempted to carry to term, to the point where one’s bodily autonomy is invalidated… … then the State should arrange to remove what it wants from the pregnancy as soon as medically viable so it can raise it for itself. This means that, if a there’s no separate survival prior to, say, 21 weeks at minimum, which I think is the earliest survival, then to preserve autonomy, the State should not interfere with any medical procedures before them. Otherwise, it will be laying claim to something it can’t take, forcing someone to carry that explicitly does not want.

If a State or whatever law-making/law-enforcement body insisted upon every individual pregnancy be attempted to carry to term, to the point where one’s bodily autonomy is invalidated… … then the State should arrange to remove what it wants from the pregnancy as soon as medically viable so it can raise it for itself. This means that, if a there’s no separate survival prior to, say, 21 weeks at minimum, which I think is the earliest survival, then to preserve autonomy, the State should not interfere with any medical procedures before them. Otherwise, it will be laying claim to something it can’t take, forcing someone to carry that explicitly does not want.

[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]