I understood what you meant. It’s a mathematical diversity you’re talking about, like how too much random means no discernible pattern, no compression possible, everything optimally distant from each other in uniqueness so that all we could say about it is “now it’s all the same in its differentness”.
But that doesn’t happen but artificially.
Natural randomness *does* clump, have clusters and patterns.
–
In fact, to achieve such perfect diversity, what they’d have to have in common is the algorithm that provides maximum diversity, linking them all together by that algorithm, so not diverse at all.
So, no.
====
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]