I think the “no need for big bang” thing is more a political move supported by mathematics rather than something tangible and provable.

Yeah, I tend to agree with you Stacy. I think the “no need for big bang” thing is more a political move supported by mathematics rather than something tangible and provable.

 

But… I’m open to it. Growing up, I heard about Big Bang, Big Crunch, oscillating Universe, and Steady State was like this toilet paper stuck to the shoe of theoretical physics.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


8 − four =

Leave a Reply