But reality has layers and perspectives. “is white”, isn’t.
It can be considered such as an abbreviation or shortcut, but it’s an apparition. It’s only a fact in a limited context.
An apple is only an apple because to humans that is its utility and we named it as such for our purposes. But from a submicroscopic perspective, there is no such object as “apple”. If you eye was the size of the moon and your visual acuity was limited, there would be no such thing as apple.
Perhaps I am a deconstructionalist. I dunno. I’m just trying to get to the bottom of things – and to the top, and to the middle, to get as completely accurate a picture as I can.
I take nothing for granted and I know that can be annoying.
I don’t see a dichotomy between real and unreal. Our comprehension of reality is limited because humans can only deal in abstractions FROM reality. What we name and define isn’t “the thing”. The thing is real, yes, but it’s limited to our usage of the thing, our utility, our perspective. For what ends is up to what we consider to be important at the time.