I only read one book of his It was quite good — up to a point And then he crossed that point Once he crossed that point he kept going And I couldn’t follow across the same river as he. I wanted to: I liked the other things he wrote when building his case. But he jumped over something very important and kept going. I wrote down what it was and where someplace. It explains for me why I often find he shows up as a thinker that’s in the same family of thought that I seem to be in yet different enough that I can’t recommend without some caveats

I only read one book of his

It was quite good — up to a point

And then he crossed that point

Once he crossed that point he kept going

And I couldn’t follow across the same river as he.

I wanted to: I liked the other things he wrote when building his case.

But he jumped over something very important and kept going. I wrote down what it was and where someplace.

It explains for me why I often find he shows up as a thinker that’s in the same family of thought that I seem to be in yet different enough that I can’t recommend without some caveats

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


six − 4 =

Leave a Reply