I know I’m intuitionist logic, 2nd order logic, fixed-point (can’t go without it as nice as purely relativistic might seem), partial ordered sets, discrete > smooth, function > form, pragmatic > idealistic, nurses ethics > most others — which is kind of a compassionate ethics with case-based utilitarianism thrown in there… so I dunno who I’d fit in with but I could probably manage _some_ kind of understanding but I don’t know how much.

I know I’m intuitionist logic, 2nd order logic, fixed-point (can’t go without it as nice as purely relativistic might seem), partial ordered sets, discrete > smooth, function > form, pragmatic > idealistic, nurses ethics > most others — which is kind of a compassionate ethics with case-based utilitarianism thrown in there… so I dunno who I’d fit in with but I could probably manage _some_ kind of understanding but I don’t know how much.

—-

Chaos / complexity, ecological/environmental/contextual stuff (the negative space makes the thing, which is sort of inverse of forms as the form never really.. forms…) yet also there’s rational choices as well, choosing from a picklist > % based… analogies/metaphors yet not to the point of Sapir-Whorf but in that family > Pinker’s fixed wiring… ok, that’s enough brain dump 　 – no idea where I’d fit entirely.

====

 

[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]