I found Emergence was a way to create a path that led-to a dualistic formulation whereby one could choose whether to view a structure as monism or dualism, the dualism being justifiable if viewed as a convenience due to tradition (hence the language to discuss is available easily) and NOT as an absolute fundamental distinction … I think.

I found Emergence was a way to create a path that led-to a dualistic formulation whereby one could choose whether to view a structure as monism or dualism, the dualism being justifiable if viewed as a convenience due to tradition (hence the language to discuss is available easily) and NOT as an absolute fundamental distinction … I think.

==

 terminology is my downfall. Trying to get my brain back into a place it was in back in may 2021
[i know it was may 2021 because I found a graphic I made then with a date]. This is a non-dual graphic – going from simple to complex in the middle reflecting my way of thinking [and hopefully correctly generally]
I ended up with a pluralistic ontology BECAUSE of the incompatibility of terminology across domains
  • Like
Any translation into philosophical terms will have to be after the fact. For me to attempt to do so while puzzling it out will cease my mental machine
  • Like
  • (sieze / cease)
    • Like
  • ===

But, don’t you apply logic when defining terms? What way of thinking is used when defining terms if not logic?

oh, the “everything’s science” way. That’s my tilt too which is probably why my brain goes ouchy-hurty when I have to abandon that and divorce the two

==

 

No, I embark in earnest. I attempt to ‘do logic’ but it’s likely I will sometimes slide into conceptual analysis inadvertently. But not intentionally. Not sophistry.
  • Like

===

 

I found some images of Pregnant God with Universe in the belly for Panentheism but I can’t remember how I did a bridge. Oh well, another time.
  • Like

==

 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


eight − = 5

Leave a Reply