I found Emergence was a way to create a path that led-to a dualistic formulation whereby one could choose whether to view a structure as monism or dualism, the dualism being justifiable if viewed as a convenience due to tradition (hence the language to discuss is available easily) and NOT as an absolute fundamental distinction … I think.
==
terminology is my downfall. Trying to get my brain back into a place it was in back in may 2021
[i know it was may 2021 because I found a graphic I made then with a date]. This is a non-dual graphic – going from simple to complex in the middle reflecting my way of thinking [and hopefully correctly generally]
—
I ended up with a pluralistic ontology BECAUSE of the incompatibility of terminology across domains
-
Like
Any translation into philosophical terms will have to be after the fact. For me to attempt to do so while puzzling it out will cease my mental machine
-
Like
-
(sieze / cease)
-
Like
-
- ===
But, don’t you apply logic when defining terms? What way of thinking is used when defining terms if not logic?
—
oh, the “everything’s science” way. That’s my tilt too which is probably why my brain goes ouchy-hurty when I have to abandon that and divorce the two
==
No, I embark in earnest. I attempt to ‘do logic’ but it’s likely I will sometimes slide into conceptual analysis inadvertently. But not intentionally. Not sophistry.
-
Like
===
I found some images of Pregnant God with Universe in the belly for Panentheism but I can’t remember how I did a bridge. Oh well, another time.
-
Like
==
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]