I forgot Dawkins existed tbh. Been a few years since he was in the big spotlight. I’ll give this a thought. Good question.
I gotta go with Cox / Sagan for communicating the absolute wonder of things.
Neil is alright when he sticks to science things but his knowledge of history is atrocious.
Dawkins gets too many points off for extracurricular work, plus his “evolution is everything” thing stretches too far in places. Of course I’d expect an evolutionary biology to see evolutionary biology in everything but he also works with outdated models. “Tree of life” is way out of touch. it’s more a messy bush of life, which doesn’t jive with his hierarchy things.