I don’t know. These seem like mickey-mouse high level overviews. Presumably there are 100 pg thick PDFs around with detail. But upon learning that the bulk of the burden is Federal — 58% Forest is Federal, 3% State, it’s unreasonable to put the bulk of blame on the State of California while not giving proportional weight to the role of the Federal.

 I don’t know. These seem like mickey-mouse high level overviews. Presumably there are 100 pg thick PDFs around with detail.
But upon learning that the bulk of the burden is Federal — 58% Forest is Federal, 3% State, it’s unreasonable to put the bulk of blame on the State of California while not giving proportional weight to the role of the Federal.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ six = 8

Leave a Reply