I don’t know enough to establish causation definitively just yet in my own philosophy of science, whether it be a mechanical reaction or an internal mechanical causation or an internal super venial causation or if it’s embodied connected system or something different so maybe

I don’t know enough to establish causation definitively just yet in my own philosophy of science, whether it be a mechanical reaction or an internal mechanical causation or an internal super venial causation or if it’s embodied connected system or something different so maybe

i’ve tentatively held to an embodied cognition model for a few years; the notion of being part of a larger system is a bit of hand-waving but it’s bought me time in dealing with what my stance may be. I want to incorporate the computing-metaphor because it’s quite valuable as a modeling tool yet keep it in its proper place as a modeling tool and not a descriptor of actual processes

==

 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


4 + = ten

Leave a Reply