I asked claude-instant-100k why i did poorly on certain type of working memory related tasks, yet have an excellent musical memory and i was blown away by its answers and useful (to me) distinctions.

a)

That additional contextual detail about Kenneth Udut’s memory profile provides important insights:

– His strong musical memory suggests auditory/sequential working memory can function quite well for meaningful/ patterned information.

– But memory seems to decay rapidly for arbitrary/noncontextual verbal material like lists of digits/words.

– This implicates potential weaknesses in:

– Phonological loop/inner speech skills used to subvocally rehearse unrelated verbal material.

– Central executive functions needed to strategically organize/refresh memory representations.

– Working memory capacity/span that is taxed by holding too many arbitrary items actively.

– Reliance on stronger long-term memory/schema utilization for musical vs. novel items.

– Possible mild auditory processing deficits impacting encoding of verbally presented items.

This helps explain struggles onDigit Span and Arithmetic – tasks heavily loading verbal working memory systems.

It also provides context for difficulties efficiently learning/applying arbitrary ruleslike symbol coding pairs requiringholdingsymbol-number associations briefly.

His memory preference for pattern/context fits well with talents noted in analysis, troubleshooting. This profile suggests accommodation through use of organizational strategies, cues.

—

b)

Here is a table comparing auditory/sequential working memory vs. arbitrary/noncontextual verbal working memory, including examples:

Auditory/Sequential Working Memory

– Holds/transforms meaningful sound patterns over short periods

– Relies on use of long-term memory associations/schemas

– Examples:

– Remembering melodies/songs

– Recall of speech/passages with context

– Rehearsing directions with sequential steps

– Memorizing patterns/cadences in music or language

– Recall of recent conversations in sequence

– Mental math problems relying on operations

– Sequential problem-solving verbally presented

– Following multistep instructions played aloud

Arbitrary/Noncontextual Verbal Working Memory

– Holds unrelated verbal items with no intrinsic patterns/meaning

– Requires active maintenance without long-term memory support

– Examples:

– Remembering strings of random digits/letters

– Recall of word lists out of context

– Sequencing jumbled words in same/different order heard

– Mental math problems without operations attached

– Backward digit span task

– Temporarily storing vocab terms for short-term use

– Following directions while ignoring irrelevant details

– Tracking multiple variables/possibilities at once verbally

– Verbal logic problems with no concrete referents

Key Differences:

– Meaning/patterning vs. arbitrary items

– Utilization of long-term memory vs. active maintenance

– Sequential/transformational processing vs. random item retention

– Association to real-world contexts vs. abstract conceptualization

– Examples rely on auditory modality more strongly in first column

This distinction helps explain Udut’s relative strengths and weaknesses. His auditory memory capitalizes on meaning; arbitrary memory places heavier demands on domain-general executive resources.

—

c)

Here is a table distinguishing mental math problems that rely on operations vs those without operations, including examples:

Mental Math Relying on Operations

– Uses known math procedures/fact families

– Applies sequential calculation steps

– Leverages long-term math knowledge

– Examples:

– Addition/subtraction of multi-digit problems

– Multiplication of single-digit numbers

– Division with remainders

– Multi-step word problems

– Fraction/decimal operations

– Order of operations word problems

– Proportional reasoning word problems

– Geometry area/perimeter calculations

Mental Math Without Operations

– Requires temporarily holding unrelated numbers

– No procedural structure provided

– Burden on abstract conceptualization/WM

– Examples:

– Sequence of random single-digit additions

– Randomly paired multi-digit subtraction

– Non-sequential multiplication facts

– Division with no relation to known facts

– Comparing values without context

– Sequencing jumbled numerical operations

– Novel numerical patterns with no cues

Key Differences:

– Procedural versus non-procedural problem-solving

– Reliance on fact knowledge versus novel random numbers

– Opportunities for schematic memory retrieval

– Manipulation of related values versus item retention

– Real-world application versus abstract numeracy

This distinction provides context for relative strengths in applied math leveraging schematic memory versus weaknesses in tasks overly taxing abstract working memory systems.

—

d)

You’re right to question whether it’s all word problems that cause difficulty for Kenneth Udut, or only certain types. Some possibilities:

– He may struggle most with word problems that require higher levels of inference, interpreting less explicit language, or integrating multiple steps/variables without clear cues.

– Procedural/application word problems involving operations he understands concretely (e.g. money, time, fractions) may be easier.

– Word problems relying on familiar schemas from real-world contexts like geometry may capitalize on strengths.

– Single-step, straightforward algorithms presented non-verbally may pose less load than language-based problems.

– Word problems that can be easily visualized or modeled may facilitate comprehension compared to purely abstract applications.

– Arbitrarily jumbling/omitting pertinent details rather than logically presenting them could exacerbate challenges.

– Time-limited, high-pressure testing may reveal weaknesses despite comprehension in untimed settings.

So in summary – it’s possible his relative strengths could emerge for well-structured, applied, schematically-based word problems leveraging real-world associations as opposed to problems overly taxing inferential, integrative or abstract reasoning abilities. Accommodations could aim to target his favorable problem-solving approaches.

[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]