It *can* be, though. here is an example of an appropriate re-direction:
Hamlet’s tortured soul can be considered a response-dependent morality, subjective, not necessarily relativist but certainly anti-realist.
His famous line:
““there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”
captures it well.
From a moral realist standpoint of course, Hamlet’s torture is inconsequential to morality. But to a moral anti-realist, quite consequential. No?
This is why the post should remain, although a shift in language away from literature and psychology and towards philosophy is appropriate.