Going through my notes: I seem to have shifted towards “hierarchical bayesian brain” over connectionism and modularity, although the more I’m looking I’m seeing I don’t think I ever _really_ held a specalization/modular view of the brain. Rather, it was something one has to work with because so much writing uses that language. But I’ll have to see if the way that neuroscientists write about ‘parts of the brain’ is something measured with this dichotomy or if it’s another way.
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]