getting better:
Yes, this interpretation could be revised if the idea of the divine was replaced with the concept of a hybrid communication-as-divinity. In this case, the ontology would be centered around the idea that communication is a kind of divine presence in the world.
In this ontology, communication would be seen as the fundamental source of all existence, and the material world would be seen as a manifestation of communication. Communication would be both immanent and transcendent, meaning that it would be present in all things, but not necessarily identical to them.
In this ontology, the material world would be seen as a way to connect with communication, and as a way to access different realms or domains. Communication would be seen as a way to connect with each other and with different aspects of our experience, and as a way to bridge the gap between different realms or domains.
Overall, this ontology would be focused on the idea that communication is a kind of divine presence in the world, and that it allows us to connect with each other and with different aspects of our experience. It would see communication as a fundamental aspect of the universe, and as a way to connect with each other and with the divine.
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]