For entanglement “in the wild” (not in a lab, not used for a quantum computer, not an “atom in a box”): WHERE is the other member of the pair? If measurement “collapses the wave function” and stops the entanglement, that’s just because it’s connecting with the measuring device INSTEAD of its previous pair. IF a set of entangled thingies near you can all be entangled with other thingies either near or far away until disturbed, the interconnectivity provided by entanglement SEEMS a PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE thing, the connection remaining only so long as it’s not disturbed. Wrong or right or sorta?

For entanglement “in the wild” (not in a lab, not used for a quantum computer, not an “atom in a box”):

WHERE is the other member of the pair?

If measurement “collapses the wave function” and stops the entanglement, that’s just because it’s connecting with the measuring device INSTEAD of its previous pair.

IF a set of entangled thingies near you can all be entangled with other thingies either near or far away until disturbed, the interconnectivity provided by entanglement SEEMS a PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE thing, the connection remaining only so long as it’s not disturbed.

Wrong or right or sorta?

[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]