I’m focusing on “What’s good”. Sometimes I focus on what’s not good – when politics and fundamentalist thinking gets mixed into it, just as I sometimes focus on what’s not good with the single-blind peer review process for peer reviewed papers. [WHY they don’t switch to double-blind has some of the lamest excuses]
But, I think it’s possible to both simultaneously.
Focus on what’s good and use it while ALSO combating what’s broken.