dude, that’s David Duke, Farrakan stuff. Yeah, some Jewish business folks did own and trade in slaves in America, but Jewish population then and now were the minority in population amount – AND a minority in the amount of slave owning and trading. MOST of the slave owners and slave traders were Christians because Christians made up the bulk of the businessmen and Christians made up the bulk of the property ownership and Christians made up the bulk of the ship owning and building, including the slave trading and slave owning.

dude, that’s David Duke, Farrakan stuff.
Yeah, some Jewish business folks did own and trade in slaves in America, but Jewish population then and now were the minority in population amount – AND a minority in the amount of slave owning and trading.
MOST of the slave owners and slave traders were Christians because Christians made up the bulk of the businessmen and Christians made up the bulk of the property ownership and Christians made up the bulk of the ship owning and building, including the slave trading and slave owning.
Why do you see the same few Jewish names in that alt-history stuff you read, when you see a whole BUNCH of non-Jewish names in history books with equivalent or more power?
Because there were more non-Jewish families in control of more things.
Fact is, it irritated Christians then that ANY Jewish families had ANY influence at all anywhere because Christians had and have MOST of the power and influence.
They change their names?
How much do you need this to be true?
They change their names.
The mental gymnastics astounds but you’re not alone. Far from alone.
Criticizing certain specific FAMILIES? Go for it.
Criticizing everybody those families might possibly be related to through religion? Ridiculous.
Do most American Jewish families benefit from this supposed high power?
They do not.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× seven = 7

Leave a Reply