“Do you still assert as you initially did that Chat GPT is “barely” programmed with biases rather than my claim that it is ENTIRELY programmed with biases.”
Yes. I still assert it. Why? Because the biases are part of the ecosystem of what’s considered knowledge. It’s nothing to “program it in”: you just use what’s everywhere.
To intentionally “program it in” implies going AGAINST some prevailing winds. But it wasn’t. It just used what crap was laying around.
—
yeah. no argument here. When I mentioned knowledge is just comparing words in spreadsheets vs words in other spreadsheets that’s what i was implying.
Ontologies vs ontologies, all contextual and specialised, many conflicting, some cooperate somewhat,
—
hell if i know. you keep dancing around whatever your point is
—
I mean i can be pretty vague and abstract and slip around the point sometimes but damn man you got me beat in that dept.
—