Connecting random thoughts to what I’ve created so far and see where they fit. I’ve always felt an affinity for Quakers, and “Type Theory” is currently at the center for some reason, so can Wikipedia link Quaker and Type Theory in a way that I don’t mind adding? YES. It’s next.

Connecting random thoughts to what I’ve created so far and see where they fit. I’ve always felt an affinity for Quakers, and “Type Theory” is currently at the center for some reason, so can Wikipedia link Quaker and Type Theory in a way that I don’t mind adding? YES. It’s next.

BUT I have to find something existing to add Quaker TO, and _then_ I can link it to Type Theory. Then I’ll redo the circle and watch how everything shifts. Addictive.

==

 

Now is there a space for your philosophy here? Hm, it’s not quite sadism nor trolling, neither of which have a spot, and I’m not really focusing on that.
 
But you seem to have an “identity (social science)” as you have a gatekeeping “we” “you” going on. Ah! in-group / out-group. Good. Thank you. You’re actually helpful.
===

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


six + = 11

Leave a Reply