I’m an advocate of freedom of the press.
I’m an advocate of freedom of speech in the public square.
But there’s also such a thing as “Public Nuisance” laws.
That’s where things get difficult and the lines get blurry, even legally.
—
If a man runs around naked down a public street with a pair of socks on that says “Yay Nudity!”, he can argue he’s expressing his freedom of speech.
But, if the neighborhood finds that disagreeable, that can be a public nuisance and laws against such actions can be codified into law.
===
Naked Nazi’s yelling outside of elementary schools is one possible future sans public nuisance laws.
====
[yes, I pulled a “what about the children?” argument. Totally wrong of me but it’s a good way to determine someone else’s libertarianness 
🙂 ]
====
It’s my right-wing sorting tool. I have left-wing sorting tools too.
====
It’s my own devce – made it up just now in this conversation 🙂
Basically, I figured a libertarian would be like “yeah, naked nazi’s yelling outside of elementary schools is ok” whereas less libertarian people would be like “Dude, that’s just wrong.” – and then I can argue for anti-hate speech laws from there if I wanted.
=====
give the ties to the cat. Then I twist and fold under, which never works.
Someone else here at the house has a very clever method: Twist, then turn opening inside out and fold it back over the bread. works great and logical, I ‘m just too lazy.
====
I twist their arguments, turn them inside out and enclose their rhetoric with their own rhetoric inside out…
…but i don’t do it with bread.
I feel for the mold. It’s gotta get a fair shot, no?
====
I have no sympathy for moldy arguments though
====
That’s what the internet’s all about isn’t it? created by people with autistic tendencies for those with autistic tendencies to bring out the autistic tendencies in others. It’s awesome
===
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]