But Now I see the root here. Miscommunication and it was all my fault.
I gave off the erroneous impression that I was implying that it was definite or probable or likely.
But no. I was implying it was _possible_. and I failed to convey that adequately
Lack of sex in marriage can be considered abandonment – they call it “constructive abandonment”, a form of abuse, and grounds to start divorce, although not full grounds for divorce (has to be other things too).
So if she decides not to have sex as part of this arrangement, he can get out of the marriage.
So, she’s obligated to have sex with him by contract.