But for there to be a knowable, there has to be a knower to know.

Perhaps.
But for there to be a knowable, there has to be a knower to know.
Conditional? Perhaps but such a formulation rests on the assumptions of a knower which is but a conditional entity, rendering all it knows into question, no? We’re not separate from this reality we describe.

Now if you want to say “we’re nothing compared to the time scale of the Universe” – that’s fine. But not when put the way you did, without a little further explanation… that is.. if my convincing matters which.. really it doesn’t ultimately because… well, there’s nobody here. Just a conditional clacking away at a keyboard

[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


5 + three =

Leave a Reply