But also: there’s a logical reason for boundaries of objects. Without boundaries, they aren’t objects.

But also: there’s a logical reason for boundaries of objects. Without boundaries, they aren’t objects.

If there were no boundaries of objects, there would be no observable or usable properties. We only interact with the boundaries of objects, not the bulk of objects.

===

You can’t actually observe what is outside of perception.
Well yes, that’s how it operates in practice. The more you slice into the bulk of an object, what you get? more border. Because that’s all we can access.


is there ontic? we have epistemic. We create ontic.


One Thing is bulk. Differentiation is boundary. We have access to the apparition of differentiation. We do not have access to non differentiation.

===

reality of objects is a matter of faith. we have access to the phenomenal. That is what we measure and observe and interact with.


 

[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


6 × two =

Leave a Reply