Not buying it. Sorry. “If they really mean it!” “The least they could do is..” “If they want to prove” what kind of language is that? Look at the steps here: a) Immigrants come in b) Processed in Texas [they’re doing the major “ship to blue state” bs so I’m ignoring Arizona and Cali right now] How does Texas choose to process? They make decisions. So, current gov made a decision. Without warning, move migrants en masse to various places across the country without warning. The migrants did not choose. The federal government did not choose. The receiving states were caught by surprise. They did not choose. So who is choosing? Only and solely Texas alone and only Texas is responsible for this choice that Texas is making. Period. Why did Texas not contact the governors of the receiving states like NORMAL GOVERNORS WOULD DO? Paxton’s behavior is 100% abnormal here. 100% abnormal.

Not buying it. Sorry.
[read full article]
 

A preposition is a wonderful thing to end a sentence on. Regardless of whether or not one supposed is to or not supposed to, nevertheless they do so. The placement of commas has gotten me in trouble many times through the years – a penalty I don’t care of which For English has a puzzle-like flexibility that many languages also share but beautiful of, I find it which, the poetic flexibility allowed is rich. The stanza, to find can show up in a place and it’s – the unexpectedly understood! – with switch!

A preposition is a … [read full article]

 

I don’t know how much I’m a dreamer but what I am is project oriented. What I do is a get an idea and at that moment I’m GOING to accomplish it. It’s not a dream. It’s a must. And so, I tear heaven and earth apart and get it done as quickly as possible before my energy /interest runs out. It might be a 20 minute project, a 2 hour project, an 8 hour project – I’ve even had 72 hour projects – and when it’s done, I’ve done somethihng that i tell myself daily: Every day, I challenge myself: “Do something impossible today”. And so, I do. It might not be much of an impossible to other people or maybe it would. That doesn’t matter. Was it impossible to me? Did I make it possible? That’s success.

I don’t know how
[read full article]
 

Based on the analysis in your document, counterarguments to Borges’ “The Library of Babel” could include: 1. **Optimism in Information and Knowledge:** Contrary to the portrayal of information overload leading to uncertainty and despair, one could argue that the vastness of information and knowledge actually empowers humanity. This perspective sees the library not as a curse but as a testament to human intellectual achievement and the endless possibilities for discovery and understanding. 2. **The Value of Searching:** Borges emphasizes the futility of searching for meaning in an infinite library, but an opposing view could highlight the intrinsic value of the search itself. This argument suggests that the act of searching, regardless of the outcome, enriches the human experience, fostering learning, growth, and the pursuit of curiosity. 3. **Linear Progress and Historical Optimism:** The document mentions Borges’ challenge to linear progress and historical optimism. A counterargument could assert the importance and validity of viewing history as a narrative of progress and enlightenment. This view would argue that, despite setbacks, humanity has steadily advanced in terms of knowledge, ethics, and societal structures. 4. **The Constructiveness of Identity:** While Borges explores the dissolution of identity in the infinite reflections of the library, a counterargument could emphasize the constructive aspects of identity formation. This perspective would argue that identity, even if multifaceted and evolving, provides a sense of continuity, purpose, and belonging that is essential for individual and collective well-being. 5. **The Role of Definitive Answers:** Borges might seem to dismiss the importance of definitive answers, but a counterargument could underline their significance in certain contexts. In science, for example, definitive answers to specific questions have led to technological advancements and improved quality of life. This argument suggests that while philosophical exploration is valuable, concrete answers remain crucial for practical progress. These counterarguments engage with the themes presented in your analysis, offering alternative viewpoints that celebrate the human capacity for understanding, the value of pursuit, the importance of progress and identity, and the role of definitive knowledge.

Based on the analysis
[read full article]
 

I’ve never been pregnant. I never grew up black. I never grew up wealthy and I never grew up in a warzone. I can pretend to understand everybody as if they’re just like me or I’m just like them but really, that’s not true. (It’s true in many ways but to gloss over differences that make me uncomfortable doesn’t serve anybody but soothing myself) Will I convince anybody else to see things how I do? Nah. All I can do is present my perspective.

I’ve never been pregnant.
[read full article]