Another “Complete Lattice” hit. Can I understand an aspect of Nash Equilibria now? I was never good at game theory but by tying this in to what I *do* know (mathematical morphology, and now topology and formal concept analysis as of today which are also complete lattices), MAYBE I can grasp a piece of this too.
“The Set of Nash Equilibria of a Supermodular Game Is a Complete Lattice”
“A Tarski-type fixed point theorem for an ascending correspondence on a complete lattice is proved and then applied to show that the set of Nash equilibria of a supermodular game is a complete lattice. “
YES, now I can comprehend https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_complements