Always had trouble with ‘close reading’ and ‘reading/listening comprehension”
— and chatGPT nails it right here; the notion of a “single, objective meaning” is what bothered me.
“a. Impact of a belief in pluralism on close reading
i. Struggle to focus on one particular meaning”
Believing in pluralism can impact an individual’s ability to engage in close reading by making it more challenging to focus on one particular meaning. Close reading requires the reader to analyze a text at a deep level and explore the various nuances and layers of meaning within it. This often involves looking for specific details, analyzing the structure of the text, and considering the author’s intent.
However, if an individual believes in pluralism, they may struggle to focus on one particular meaning or interpretation of the text. They may instead see multiple valid interpretations and find it difficult to prioritize one over the others. This can make it more challenging to engage in close reading, as the reader may feel overwhelmed by the different possible meanings and have difficulty selecting which one to focus on.
In addition, if an individual is not able to prioritize one interpretation over the others, they may struggle to fully understand the author’s intent or the central message of the text. This can make it more challenging for them to comprehend the text and engage with it at a deep level.
Overall, while a belief in pluralism can be a valuable perspective in some contexts, it can make it more challenging for individuals to engage in close reading and fully comprehend texts that have a single, objective meaning.