A robot is a cross between a lawnmower and a child.

I was wrong in my conclusion, but I believe I am correct in my assertion that a robot, legally _might_ be considered somewhere in the spectrum between a lawnmower and all of its liabilities and a child and all of his/her criminal liabilities.


 I believe it is important to establish where in the spectrum a robot should fit, or rather, where it should NOT fit.

I do not believe a robot should be considered an autonomous being with the same rights and privileges and responsibilities as an adult human.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


− 8 = one

Leave a Reply